Thursday, October 23, 2014

Lecture Notes #3


POLS 220

N BERCH

FALL 2014

 

Political Participation

 

I.                     Introduction

A.       Voter participation in the US is quite low—50% or so for presidential elections, 35% for midterms, down to 10% for school elections.  This compares to about 80% in European countries

B.      Other forms of participation:  US is at the top of the list.  This includes a lot of local politics.  The importance of interest groups versus parties is a factor.

C.      Even within the US, there is great variation in voter turnout between states.

 

II.                   Why is there so much variation between the US states?

A.       political culture

B.      party competition

C.      ease of registration

1.        used to be used to exclude

2.       Motor Voter applies to all states, but makes little difference

D.       ease of voting:  absentee ballots, early voting, mail-in ballots, Saturday voting

E.       level of education

F.       election cycle

G.     West Coast effect

H.      direct democracy

 

III.                How could WV improve voter participation?

 

 

Legislatures

 

I.         Introduction:  why would anyone want to be in the legislature?

 

II.  How the legislature has changed:  greater professionalism.

A.      more lawyers—1/6 vs. ½ in Congress; WV is about average.

B.      more pay--$100 in NH, over $100,000 in NY and CA; $15,000 in WV

C.      longer sessions—WV extended to 60-60 in 1973; still below average but often goes beyond limits.

D.       more staff; WV uses lots of in-session staff

E.       better facilities

F.       still great variation from state to state

 

III.                How legislatures work

A.       Committees

1.        typical House and Senate members serve on three committees each

2.       WV House members serve on about 3; Senators about 6.

3.       WV has its experience concentrated on Finance and Judiciary Committees

B.       Norms

1.        specialization

2.       courtesy

3.       apprenticeship/seniority

4.       reciprocity

C.       cue voting

1.        why?

2.        party

3.       region

 

IV.                 What do we expect from our representatives?

A.       policy representation—hard to evaluate

B.      pork barrel representation—Daniel Flood

C.      casework representation—John Miller

D.      symbolic representation—George Hansen

 

V.                   Electing legislators

A.       Apportionment

1.        gerrymandering—protecting incumbents, party

2.       the odd effects of race and party

3.       multimember districts—WV uses more than almost every other state, but less than it once did

B.       Cost

1.        highest for CA Senate—up to $2 million

2.       WV is about average

C.       turnover

1.        related to resources, prestige, staffing

2.       WV among highest in nation

D.       Do we really want citizen legislators?

E.       What if WV raised the salary to $40,000 and made it a full-time job?

 

Governors

 

I.          Increase in formal powers, stature, professionalism

A.       Goodbye to Goodtime Charlie

B.      Especially strong in the Northeast—MD, MA, WV, NY

C.      increase in tenure potential, budget power

D.      Veto power (now in all states)—what about the line item veto?

1.        variation in power:  regular line item veto in 43 states, reduction item veto in 11, and Wisconsin extreme version—Vanna White veto

2.       argument for

3.       argument against

4.       findings—only small effect on pork barrel if reduction item veto is available

5.       implications for national level

a.       more effect—unbalanced budgets

b.      less effect—mandatory spending

c.       constitutional amendment required

 

II.  Increased prominence=increased risk

A.       25% lose reelection bids—higher than Congress

B.      easy to find 1 opponent

C.      reelection tied to state economy

D.      interaction with feds, other states, business is key

E.       hard to please an entire state

Review for Exam #2


Hi, everyone!  This thread will serve as a review for exam #2 (I'll go over this review in class on Monday as well).  Exam #2 takes place in class on Wednesday, October 29.  It will be of similar format to exam #1.   You simply need to bring pen and photo ID.

To prepare for the exam, you should read through blog assignments 3 and 4 (on single member plurality and  on term limits for legislators).  You should be familiar with my post, the articles I link to, and the comments of your colleagues.  In terms of material covered in class, you should be familiar with all of the material on third parties (from the second set of lecture notes), as well as all of the material on voter turnout, legislatures, and governors (from the third set of lecture notes).  Both sets of lecture notes were distributed in class and are also on the blog. Specifically, from class, you should be familiar with:

The difficulties facing third parties (with perhaps extra emphasis on single member plurality).
Why third parties sometimes overcome these difficulties.
Why voter turnout is higher in some states than it is in others.

The reasons people run for the legislature.
The different types of representation people expect from legislators.
The professionalization of the legislature.
Legislative norms and cue voting.
Committees in the legislature.
Gerrymandering and multimember districts.
The increased power of governors.
The line item veto, including its variations, and arguments for and against it.
Why governors have a harder time getting reelected than do other officials.

I will have my usual office hours on Monday and Wednesday in case you want to ask questions.  You can also email them to me at the email address on the syllabus.  Finally, you can use the comments section on this thread for questions.  You'll then be able to ask your questions on the blog and read my answers to questions from other students in the class (this really has worked for people!).  Emailed and blog questions must be submitted by 9 pm on Tuesday.  Good luck!


Update:  As of 10:25 pm, October 28, comments are closed.  Read through comments for valuable information.  I still have office hours on Wednesday.--NB

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Blog Assignment #4, Due 2 pm, October 27

Before I get to the assignment, let me cover a few items of business.  As you know, this assignment was postponed.  It is due on Monday, October 27.  Also note that exam #2 takes place on Wednesday, October 29.  It will cover all material since exam #1, including blog assignments #3 and #4.  The format will be the same as for exam #1.  Review sheet will be distributed in class on October 27; it will be posted here as well.  The review process will be the same as for exam #1 with the same opportunities to ask questions, etc. in all the different formats.  Also note that the journals on the WV elections are due on November 10 (electronically, at berchnorto@msn.com). 

This assignment is about term limits for legislators.  Just to be clear, term limits are different from "terms".  In every state, every legislator serves for a specified term, usually 2 or 4 years.  At the end of that term, if s/he wants to remain in office, s/he must run for reelections.  Term LIMITS limit the number of two or four year terms that a legislator may serve (for instance, a state may say that a House member may serve no more than 4 2-year terms--or 8 years--after that, they may not run for reelection, no matter how popular they may be).

As we discussed in class, about 1/3 of the states limit the time that state legislators can serve in the legislature.  Some limit them consecutively, some over a lifetime; some let legislators move from one house to the other, others do not.  Most of these term limits were instituted through voter initiative. 
Here is a chart showing the current status of term limits:
http://www.ncsl.org/legislatures-elections/legisdata/chart-of-term-limits-states.aspx
Arguments for term limits include that they reduce corruption, create citizen legislators, increase diversity in the legislature, and create more competitive elections.  Arguments against include that they put more power in the hands of the governor, the unelected bureaucracy, and lobbyists, that they reduce the quality of those seeking office, and that they do NOT increase diversity or competition.  Further, opponents argue that they are inherently undemocratic, as they take choice away from voters.
This is a good summary of arguments on both sides (be sure to click both tabs):  http://idebate.org/debatabase/debates/philosophical-political-theory/house-would-enforce-term-limits-legislative-branch-government

Here is a link to a short article against term limits:  http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2012/07/the_case_against_legislative_t.html

Here is a link to a short piece in favor of term limits (though they focus on the national level, the arguments aren't that different at the state level):
http://termlimits.com/answers.htm

You can find a ton of arguments out there on related issues.  Indeed, part of your assignment is to find sources that make sense rather than any random stuff out there on the Internet.  You can find pieces on how term limits impact women candidates, how they affect competition, their impact on the minority party in a state, and much more.  Assignments are due at 2:00 pm on Monday, October 27.

Your task is to write about whether you think legislative term limits would be a good idea for West Virginia.  Better answers use reasons and evidence, and they also address the comments of your colleagues. 

Friday, October 17, 2014

Thursday, October 9, 2014

Meeting observation paper--additional opportunity

Hi, everyone!  As you know, your meeting observation papers are due in class (hard copy, please--unlike the journals) on Wednesday, October 15.  Many of you reported that you were thwarted in your attempts to see the Morgantown City Council Meeting on October 7,  As indicated in class, while I prefer that you attend meetings in person to get the full flavor, the intersection of this event with Fall Break has caused me to make an exception in this instance.  You may view a Morgantown meeting online and write about it (no agenda copy needed if that proves too difficult).  The web site is http://morgantown.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=2
Happy viewing, and have a fun and safe break!--NB